Last week I attended my grandfather’s funeral in the Hollywood Hills, north of Los Angeles. It was a beautiful service at Mt. Sinai amidst the brush-laden rolling brown hills of southern California. Green shrubs and bushes dotted the landscape beneath blue skies and a salty ocean breeze was breathed by all living things—people tend to discount just how beautiful the earth beneath the concrete island of southern California is. Unfortunately, the saltiness was not the only thing southern Californians—including those who wished to honor the life of my Grandfather, a World War II veteran—were forced to breathe. Instead, jets terraformed the sky. I am familiar with the history of terraforming—otherwise known as chemtrailing—and an anger so pointed swelled inside of me, that I could not put my beloved Grandfather to rest without environmental terrorism, sponsored by my government, perpetuated clearly above. I kept one eye on the sky that day, and one eye on the grave.
Part of this aerosol project has been called Operation Cloverleaf. Its multipurpose operations include: weather modification, military communications, space weapons development, ozone and global warming research, as well as biological weaponry and detection testing. Consequences of these black ops include the dimming of the life-giving sunlight, and reduced atmospheric visibility with lung-clogging particulates and polymers, seriously compromising public health. [1]
In 2001, Dennis Kucinich brought the Space Preservation Act of 2001 to the House. In section 7 B he defines exotic weapons as such [2]:
(B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as--
(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;
(ii) chemtrails;
(iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;
(iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;
(v) laser weapons systems;
(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and
(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The problem of government manipulation of weather is intimately related to the weaponization of space. On January 7, 1958, Senator Lyndon B. Johnson, said “Control of space means control of the world…From space, the master of infinity would have the power to control the Earth’s weather, to cause drought and flood, to change the tides and raise the levels of the sea, to divert the Gulf Stream and change the climate to frigid…There is something more powerful than the ultimate weapon. That is the ultimate position—the position of total control over the Earth that lies somewhere in outer space…And if there is an ultimate position, then our national goal and the goal of all free men must be to win and hold that position.” In 2007, President George W. Bush called for new space missions and the weaponization of space.
ReplyDeleteOn May 19, 1945, indeed only twelve days after Germany’s unconditional surrender, Herbert Wagner, creator of the first Nazi guided missile used in combat, landed in Washington, D.C., in a U.S. military aircraft with blacked-out windows. Wagner was just the first of a whole host of Nazi scientists, technicians, and others to arrive in the United States in a program called Project Paperclip. Originally known as Operation Overcast, the program, authorized by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was also authorized by President Harry Truman, who assured that nobody with “Nazi or militaristic records” would be recruited.
By mid-November, more Nazi scientists, engineers, and technicians were arriving in America, including Wernher von Braun and more than seven hundred other Nazi rocket scientists. Von Braun is viewed by many as the father of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
By 1955, upwards of a thousand German scientists had been granted citizenship in the United States and awarded prominent positions in the American scientific community. Many had been longtime members of the Nazi Party and Gestapo, and conducted experiments on humans at concentration camps, employed slave labor, etc.
In her 1991 book Secret Agenda: The United States Government, Nazi Scientists, and Project Paperclip, 1945-1999, CNN reporter Linda Hunt demonstrated the extent to which Nazi involvement in the US was aided by persons within the U.S. federal government and military. While the government claimed the project was eliminated in 1947, Hunt maintained that the project was “the biggest, longest-running operation involving Nazi’s in our country’s history.”
Interestingly enough, the Nazi grab on the part of the U.S. was countered by the same activities by the Soviets. Well documented is the enduring communications between Nazi scientists in the U.S. and the Soviet Union, leading many researchers to brood the possibility that the space programs in each country were really one program with two factions. [3]
The dumping of particulate matter has geo-engineered our atmosphere, turning it into a highly charged, electrically-conductive plasma useful for military projects. The air is loaded with barium salts, aluminum, and perhaps even radioactive thorium. Acting as electrolytes to enhance conductivity of military radar and radio waves, these materials are simultaneously so poisonous as arsenic. Atmospheric barium weakens all human muscles, whilst aluminum inhaled is fed to the brain, resulting in oxidative stress with brain tissue, the formation of Alzheimers like neurofibrillary tangles. Radioactive thorium, moreover, causes leukemia and other cancers.
ReplyDeleteIndependent chemtrail researcher Clifford Carnicom argues that we are also continuously subjected to extremely low electromagenetic frequencies (ELF) pulsing at 4 hertz multiplies, frequencies known to profoundly affect human biological and mental functioning.
The institutions involved in these operations include the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) and its research arm DARPA, plus the Department of Energy (DOE), with its network of national labs and universities. Private defense contractors and pharmaceutical companies are also complicit, as well as the United Nations, considering the global nature of the aerosol projects.
In 1997, Dr. Edward Teller, father of the hydrogen bomb, publicly explained a proposal to use aircraft to spread in the stratosphere millions of tons of electrically-conductive metallic materials, allegedly to curb global warming.
Shortly thereafter, terraforming operations began. Teller discussed that commercial aircraft could be used to scatter these particles cheaply, for approximately 33 cents to a pound. A science textbook used by some public schools, next to a photo of a large orange-red jet, states “jet engines running on richer fuel would add particles to the atmosphere to create a sunscreen. Information such as this appearing in a public school level textbook, hints at an ongoing program by the establishment to normalize the particulate pollution.
These particles and polymers are smaller than 10 microns (PM 10) and are undetectable by the human eye. EPA scientists report that PM10 and sub-micron pollution particles bypass lung filters and enter the blood stream, causing severe changes in the endocrine and nervous systems. Increased risk of blood clots and vessel damage arises. Further, Taiwanese researchers note “a significant increase” in the number of stroke victims when PM10 pollutant levels rise.
ReplyDeleteLately, publications which had hitherto labeled the more adept political observers as crazy or psychotic, for having noticed such clandestine activities, have admitted in part to attempts at weather modification.
The Atlantic reports that “within a few years we could cool the Earth to temperatures not regularly seen since James Watt’s steam engine belched its first smoky plume in the late 18th century.” They report such processes could be done cheaply: Anthropogenic climate change could be reversed entirely with $100 billion. Others maintain that a hundredth of that sum is all that would be needed. In April, John Holdren, President Obama’s science adviser, said such measures would be brooded “if we get desperate enough.” [4]
According to RTL German news television, “the military planes of the German Federal Army are manipulating our climate.” The clouds, up to 350 km long, appeared for the first time in the summer of 2005, and then again in March of 2006. [5]
According to meteorologist Karsten Brandt, who has filed a legal charge against unknowns for weather manipulation:
"We can state with a 97% certainty that we have our hands on chemical trails comprised by fine dust containing polymers and metals, used to disrupt radar signals. This is their main purpose, but I was surprised that this artificial cloud was so widespread. The radar images are stunning considering the needed tons of dispersed elements."
German Green Party member Johannes Remmel maintains,
"It’s obvious that enormous regions are being polluted with clandestine actions, but all of this has to be made public. The government must provide explanations to the unsuspecting population."
The Atlantic also states, “If Geo-engineers have a natural enemy, it is the sun.” Further, the journal champions sulfur-aerosol injection as “the least mad,” and cites the eruption of Mount Tambora as evidence. In 1815, when that mountain shot sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, farmers in New England were visited by such a chilly summer, that their fields frosted over in July. The Mount Pinatubo eruption in the Phillipines in 1991, furthermore, cooled global temperatures by approximately half a degree Celsius for the next few years. A sulfur-aerosol operation, states the Atlantic, could equal a Pinatubo of sulfur dioxide every four years.
Yet, many are apprehensive about the very cheap geo-engineering plan. Opponents argue that such projects could produce acid rain and decimate plant and fish life. It is also prone to generating major shifts in the climate that would hit the globe in an unpredictable manner. Indeed, Holdren also claims we do not know enough about the details to predict the effects. Martin Bunzl, a Rutgers climate-change policy expert, says that one billion—most likely in Africa—would be negatively affected, living “in a climate even hotter and drier than before.” Rainfall in India, also, might considerably decline, since the monsoons depend on temperature differences between the Asian landmass and the ocean, and sulfur-aerosols could reduce the difference.
Currently, global atmospheric CO2 levels are rising at about 2ppm/year toward 388ppm. In his first interview since being appointed as Obama’s new science adviser, John Holdren divulged to AP (8 April, 09) “global warming is so dire, the Obama administration is discussing radical technologies to cool Earth’s air” which “as an experimental measure would only be used as a last resort…It’s got to be looked at... we don’t have the luxury of taking any approach off the table…One such extreme option includes shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun’s ray.”
ReplyDeleteMany observers of terraforming over the years, including former intelligence personnel, consider the possibility that chemicals in the aerosols are set to activiate “constituents” in the coming forced Swine Flu vaccinations, reported by Project Camelot. Apparently a senior biochemist at a leading pharmaceutical company said:
“an aerosol precursor has been [sprayed] into the air and almost everyone has breathed it into their lungs. The biochemist states that the vaccines to be administered in the fall will be ACTIVATED when the constituents come in contact with the aerosoled precursor in the body and will cause a rapid spread of the H1N1 Influenza A virus.”
The fiber morgellon has been detected everywhere, from San Diego to upstate New York, and many ask the question if this is one such constituent of chemtrails.
Information of Morgellons is murky. Wikipedia notes that “most doctors, including dermatologists and psychiatrists, regard Morgellons as a manifestation of known medical conditions, including delusional parasitosis.” However, is Wikipedia a trusted source when it comes to serious research? When one types in “chemtrail conspiracy” into Wikipedia, although mainstream publications are admitting these operations, the site holds “the existence of chemtrails has been repeatedly refuted by government agencies and scientists around the world.” When these projects are admitted, they are often cited as operations meant to combat global warming; the science of global warming, even so, has come up against much resistance.
In urgent and emotive language, with the help of a metaphor describing humanity as passengers in a car driving off a cliff, Holdren said “the sensible passengers will certainly say: “Let’s put on the brakes, even if we don’t know it will save us. It may be too late. We don’t know exactly where the cliff is…Let’s get on with it.” Get on with what? Who are the “we” and “us” to whom Holdren refers?
ReplyDeleteScience, like all epistemes, is prone to paradigm shifts. The science of climatic change is not an exact science, for our understanding of the climate is always changing. Without revision in science, we would still think the world was flat and the Sun revolved around our planet.
Climates are always changing. There was the period we term the Ice Age, which was a long-term period of reduced global temperature, resulting in the expansion of continental ice sheets and glaciers—the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, for example, were formed in this period. The ice age formed valleys, rock formations, and the like as glaciers advanced across the continents. Once the glaciers receded, the landscape was free for plant growth and life. The Great Lakes between Canada and the United States were carved by ice. Thereafter, the Halocene period began roughly 12,000 B.C. Human civilization has occurred entirely within the Halocene period.
The Halocene period was a time of both global warming and cooling periods. From 10,000 to 8500 BC, there was a minor cooling period known as the Younger-Dryas. From 5000 and 3000 B.C., on the other hand, temperatures increased to a level higher than today, what is referred to as the Climatic Optimum. It was during this warming period that the first large human civilizations began to develop, such as the ancient African civilization around the Nile.
Between 3000 and 2000 BC, there was a cooling period, and a subsequent drop in sea levels, liberating islands like the Bahamas from the sea, followed by a cool period, leading to glacial growth. The Roman Empire (150 BC-300 AD) occurred during a cooling period, which last until roughtly 900AD. From 900 A.D. to 1200 A.D., there was a warming period known as the Medieval Warming Period, which was warmer than today,and resulted in viticulture and agriculture in the North Atlantic, as well as the settling of Greenland and Iceland.
The Little Ice followed, lasting from 1550 to 1850—coinciding with the Industrial Revolution—when temperatures were colder than at any other time since the end of the previous Ice Age. Since, there has been a general warming period. [6]
So, whether you witness these jets retracing the same flight patterns over and over again, from military base to military base—when I was a student in McMinnville, OR, I witnessed regularly planes flying from south of Seattle to San Francisco—or see isolated trails floating in the sky, as if out of nowhere, these operations are real, and there many side effects pose a huge threat to public health.
Jane Burgermeister recently filed charges against the U.N., W.H.O., & Obama accusing them of creating a flu intended to depopulate the world. I believe similar charges can be brought up against the same institutions and others in relation to manipulation of the weather and pollution of the atmosphere.
1.Worthington, Amy. Chemtrails: Aerosol and Electromagnetic Weapons in the Age of Nuclear War. Global Research, 1 June 2004. EXTENDED BIBLIOGRAPHY FOUND HERE,
ReplyDeleteavailable at: http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/WOR406A.html
2.Kucinich, Dennis. Space Presrvation Act of 2001 (introduced in House).
available at: http://www.dontchemtrailmebro.com
3. Marrs, Jim. The Rise of the Fourth Reich. Harpers.
4. Wood Graeme. Re-Engineering the Earth. The Atlantic, July/August 2009.
Available at: http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200907/climate-engineering
5. Video available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IaPqCMIuEk4
6. Marshall, Andrew. Climate Change: Breaking the Political Consensus. Global Research, 8.07.08
Available at: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9763